<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nine Deuce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 05:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francois Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/about/#comment-20446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francois Tremblay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, I was saying &quot;okay&quot; as an acknowledgement of what you said, and as an acknowledgement that I was shutting up and letting you or others talk. But since you&#039;re asking me a direct question (I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s sarcastic or not), I will shortly explain what I mean.

You are actually the one who opened my eyes to the fact that voluntaryism equally applies to sexual libertarians, so I was rather stunned to see you use a voluntaryist argument. In actual fact, we do impose our political visions on people&#039;s bodies all the time. We prohibit murder, theft, fraud, rape, sexual harassment, and so on (granted, none of these are fairly prohibited), because we have an idea of what society should be like (presumably, as safe as possible without interfering with people who are not attacking or intruding on others) and what it shouldn&#039;t be like. (the issue of the legitimacy of laws is another thing entirely- laws are written by men for men, and they are enforced extremely unevenly and violently, but the basic principles are just)

I just wanted to know if we were on the same page. I apologize if what I wrote on my entry was offensive, that wasn&#039;t my intent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I was saying &#8220;okay&#8221; as an acknowledgement of what you said, and as an acknowledgement that I was shutting up and letting you or others talk. But since you&#8217;re asking me a direct question (I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s sarcastic or not), I will shortly explain what I mean.</p>
<p>You are actually the one who opened my eyes to the fact that voluntaryism equally applies to sexual libertarians, so I was rather stunned to see you use a voluntaryist argument. In actual fact, we do impose our political visions on people&#8217;s bodies all the time. We prohibit murder, theft, fraud, rape, sexual harassment, and so on (granted, none of these are fairly prohibited), because we have an idea of what society should be like (presumably, as safe as possible without interfering with people who are not attacking or intruding on others) and what it shouldn&#8217;t be like. (the issue of the legitimacy of laws is another thing entirely- laws are written by men for men, and they are enforced extremely unevenly and violently, but the basic principles are just)</p>
<p>I just wanted to know if we were on the same page. I apologize if what I wrote on my entry was offensive, that wasn&#8217;t my intent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nine Deuce</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/about/#comment-20410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nine Deuce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really? You think telling me I MUST abort is better than telling me I MUST NOT abort? Your view of an appropriate future might make more sense than that of Pat Robertson, but you are still trying to make rules for what goes on in my body. The point of feminism is that I am a human being, and that you do not, as a male human being, get to tell female human beings what they must do with their bodies. Get it? I demand that you have a vasectomy tomorrow. Are you going to do so? Your pro-abortion stance assumes that men will be impregnating people, and that it is women&#039;s responsibility to not give birth. If you&#039;re so anti-procreation, how about you write a pro-vasectomy series, which would address something you are actually qualified to discuss.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? You think telling me I MUST abort is better than telling me I MUST NOT abort? Your view of an appropriate future might make more sense than that of Pat Robertson, but you are still trying to make rules for what goes on in my body. The point of feminism is that I am a human being, and that you do not, as a male human being, get to tell female human beings what they must do with their bodies. Get it? I demand that you have a vasectomy tomorrow. Are you going to do so? Your pro-abortion stance assumes that men will be impregnating people, and that it is women&#8217;s responsibility to not give birth. If you&#8217;re so anti-procreation, how about you write a pro-vasectomy series, which would address something you are actually qualified to discuss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francois Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/about/#comment-20409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francois Tremblay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nine Deuce</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/about/#comment-20406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nine Deuce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Short answer: you sound like a dude trying to impose his political vision on my body.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short answer: you sound like a dude trying to impose his political vision on my body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francois Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/about/#comment-20405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francois Tremblay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, I&#039;m still going through your blog and I just hit the entry where you call yourself pro-abortion. I&#039;m actually in the middle of a pro-abortion series right now on my blog and I was wondering if you&#039;d mind if I declare you a fellow pro-abortion blogger?
I&#039;ve posted my definitions over here: http://francoistremblay.wordpress.com/2012/01/03/introduction-to-the-pro-abortion-position/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;m still going through your blog and I just hit the entry where you call yourself pro-abortion. I&#8217;m actually in the middle of a pro-abortion series right now on my blog and I was wondering if you&#8217;d mind if I declare you a fellow pro-abortion blogger?<br />
I&#8217;ve posted my definitions over here: <a href="http://francoistremblay.wordpress.com/2012/01/03/introduction-to-the-pro-abortion-position/" rel="nofollow">http://francoistremblay.wordpress.com/2012/01/03/introduction-to-the-pro-abortion-position/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/about/#comment-20137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 22:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever consider joining Flattr (a micropayment platform for web content)? Although, to be fair, it might damage your reputation as a self-proclaimed &quot;altruistic as fuck&quot; freedom fighter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever consider joining Flattr (a micropayment platform for web content)? Although, to be fair, it might damage your reputation as a self-proclaimed &#8220;altruistic as fuck&#8221; freedom fighter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sugarpuss</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/about/#comment-19974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sugarpuss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 21:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://twanzphobic.wordpress.com/2011/04/14/the-default-human-is-female/

:) I love stuff like this. Men try to keep these &lt;i&gt;facts&lt;/i&gt; hidden, but the truth will always prevail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twanzphobic.wordpress.com/2011/04/14/the-default-human-is-female/" rel="nofollow">http://twanzphobic.wordpress.com/2011/04/14/the-default-human-is-female/</a></p>
<p>:) I love stuff like this. Men try to keep these <i>facts</i> hidden, but the truth will always prevail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sneeky bunny</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/about/#comment-19968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sneeky bunny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 02:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well put gracemargaret.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put gracemargaret.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gracemargaret</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/about/#comment-19960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gracemargaret]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 03:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@pleasantwayne

The problem is with the way most men define their masculinity as something in opposition to women, who use being male as an excuse hate women, to rape and abuse women.  How are we supposed to handle this mentality?  I don&#039;t hate people for their gender, but I do hate people who use it as an exuse or justification of destroying women mentally, emotionally and physically. I&#039;m actually suprised more women don&#039;t express anger at men. It never ceases to amaze me how forgiving so many women are.

Being born male isn&#039;t a problem, but defining being a man as superior to women and using &quot;just being a man&quot; or &quot;boys will be boys&quot; as an actual excuse to harrass, abuse and rape women needs to be called out.  And it needs to be called out by the men who claim not to be that way.  If you abhor this toxic definition of masculinity that is all around us, speak UP.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pleasantwayne</p>
<p>The problem is with the way most men define their masculinity as something in opposition to women, who use being male as an excuse hate women, to rape and abuse women.  How are we supposed to handle this mentality?  I don&#8217;t hate people for their gender, but I do hate people who use it as an exuse or justification of destroying women mentally, emotionally and physically. I&#8217;m actually suprised more women don&#8217;t express anger at men. It never ceases to amaze me how forgiving so many women are.</p>
<p>Being born male isn&#8217;t a problem, but defining being a man as superior to women and using &#8220;just being a man&#8221; or &#8220;boys will be boys&#8221; as an actual excuse to harrass, abuse and rape women needs to be called out.  And it needs to be called out by the men who claim not to be that way.  If you abhor this toxic definition of masculinity that is all around us, speak UP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hecate</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/about/#comment-19956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hecate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish it were just about how &#039;individual&#039; men behave. But with systemic abuse of any kind, hatred of the oppressor should be expected and more than understood. The frustration is that this sentiment is embraced when it comes to social inequalities like racism, but rarely for sexism. Sexism is truly the last &#039;acceptable&#039; form of discrimination.

Many womyn come into this world violated and abused by men at an absurdly young age. I myself was raped with impunity by my grandfather from the age of seven. A man took it upon himself to introduce me to the world in this manner, and there&#039;s nothing about that I&#039;m supposed to hate?! Take your pompous, mansplaining ass elsewhere. There is nothing about the subordination of womyn and girls that could ever be justified, intellectually or otherwise. Until you feel that kind of oppression viscerally, on a daily basis, from the day of your birth, you will not understand what womyn have been dealing with in the face of patriarchal rule. Men hate the writings of Andrea Dworkin for example, because she takes the debate away from the language of what is being done to womyn, and puts an unflinching focus on the acts being committed to perpetuate a system of male dominance.

The Nazis had endless rationalizations around what they did. I often see males using the same reasoning. For shame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish it were just about how &#8216;individual&#8217; men behave. But with systemic abuse of any kind, hatred of the oppressor should be expected and more than understood. The frustration is that this sentiment is embraced when it comes to social inequalities like racism, but rarely for sexism. Sexism is truly the last &#8216;acceptable&#8217; form of discrimination.</p>
<p>Many womyn come into this world violated and abused by men at an absurdly young age. I myself was raped with impunity by my grandfather from the age of seven. A man took it upon himself to introduce me to the world in this manner, and there&#8217;s nothing about that I&#8217;m supposed to hate?! Take your pompous, mansplaining ass elsewhere. There is nothing about the subordination of womyn and girls that could ever be justified, intellectually or otherwise. Until you feel that kind of oppression viscerally, on a daily basis, from the day of your birth, you will not understand what womyn have been dealing with in the face of patriarchal rule. Men hate the writings of Andrea Dworkin for example, because she takes the debate away from the language of what is being done to womyn, and puts an unflinching focus on the acts being committed to perpetuate a system of male dominance.</p>
<p>The Nazis had endless rationalizations around what they did. I often see males using the same reasoning. For shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

