<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: War profiteers, unsatisfied with plain old war profiteering, now want to see you naked.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/2009/05/21/war-profiteers-unsatisfied-with-plain-old-war-profiteering-now-want-to-see-you-naked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/2009/05/21/war-profiteers-unsatisfied-with-plain-old-war-profiteering-now-want-to-see-you-naked/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeptifem</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/2009/05/21/war-profiteers-unsatisfied-with-plain-old-war-profiteering-now-want-to-see-you-naked/#comment-17038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skeptifem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/?p=1471#comment-17038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Word is that they call  it &quot;the dick measurer&quot; around airports. 

A politician from Utah is against them because its pornographic- maybe the right will inadvertently get something good done. 

I have heard Israel has the best security- you have to talk to someone and they are trained in spotting inconsistencies and behavior patterns. I haven&#039;t looked into it much so it could be bullshit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word is that they call  it &#8220;the dick measurer&#8221; around airports. </p>
<p>A politician from Utah is against them because its pornographic- maybe the right will inadvertently get something good done. </p>
<p>I have heard Israel has the best security- you have to talk to someone and they are trained in spotting inconsistencies and behavior patterns. I haven&#8217;t looked into it much so it could be bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lizor</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/2009/05/21/war-profiteers-unsatisfied-with-plain-old-war-profiteering-now-want-to-see-you-naked/#comment-17012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lizor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/?p=1471#comment-17012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ kristina - oh yeah, right ... show off, refer too, exaggerate about, obsess about, brag about, grasp at, fiddle with, build effigies to ... I can&#039;t be bothered to go on. 

 But you&#039;re right, how could I possibly forget?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ kristina &#8211; oh yeah, right &#8230; show off, refer too, exaggerate about, obsess about, brag about, grasp at, fiddle with, build effigies to &#8230; I can&#8217;t be bothered to go on. </p>
<p> But you&#8217;re right, how could I possibly forget?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristina</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/2009/05/21/war-profiteers-unsatisfied-with-plain-old-war-profiteering-now-want-to-see-you-naked/#comment-17010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kristina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/?p=1471#comment-17010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh lizor...we all know men love to show off their ding dongs... ;P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh lizor&#8230;we all know men love to show off their ding dongs&#8230; ;P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FBI Rescues 69 Kids from Sex Slavery, Doesn&#8217;t Mind Leaving 299,931 More in Danger &#171; Rage Against the Man-chine</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/2009/05/21/war-profiteers-unsatisfied-with-plain-old-war-profiteering-now-want-to-see-you-naked/#comment-17001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FBI Rescues 69 Kids from Sex Slavery, Doesn&#8217;t Mind Leaving 299,931 More in Danger &#171; Rage Against the Man-chine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 04:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/?p=1471#comment-17001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that protecting women and children from being sold into sex slavery won&#8217;t make Exxon-Mobil or L-3 Communications any money, but the FBI really ought to be spending a few more dollars on programs aimed at doing it [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that protecting women and children from being sold into sex slavery won&#8217;t make Exxon-Mobil or L-3 Communications any money, but the FBI really ought to be spending a few more dollars on programs aimed at doing it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lizor</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/2009/05/21/war-profiteers-unsatisfied-with-plain-old-war-profiteering-now-want-to-see-you-naked/#comment-16074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lizor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/?p=1471#comment-16074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh Christ on a stick. I&#039;ll bite.

Bob, the machine does not &quot;remove the need for a strip search&quot;. It does not show the contents of internal cavities. Get it???

&quot;The only people who are opposed to this kind of Tech are peadophiles, thiefs and rapist.&quot; ??

I promise you, Bob, the machine does not alarm when a peadophile walks through it. 

Just so you know, Bob, you cannot identify a thief, rapist or child molester by looking at them naked, which is what these machines do. They simply allow security personnel to look at you naked and they are being quietly installed in airports all over Canada. 

The people who are concerned about that are concerned about the erosion of their privacy. To lump informed and concerned citizens in with sexual predators indicates that it&#039;s likely you are projecting in that penultimate sentence of your silly post.

As for &quot;They only put you through this machine for the same reasons they would strip search you.&quot;, I was going through security (I travel a lot and know enough to remove all metal, my shoes, etc before I pass through the detector) and was asked to step into one of those machines. There was no cause to strip-search me. I refused to step into the machine and was patted down by a female security guard instead.

Next time try informing yourself before you mouth off and demonstrate your ignorance to all and sundry, and quit taking up space with your asinine comments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Christ on a stick. I&#8217;ll bite.</p>
<p>Bob, the machine does not &#8220;remove the need for a strip search&#8221;. It does not show the contents of internal cavities. Get it???</p>
<p>&#8220;The only people who are opposed to this kind of Tech are peadophiles, thiefs and rapist.&#8221; ??</p>
<p>I promise you, Bob, the machine does not alarm when a peadophile walks through it. </p>
<p>Just so you know, Bob, you cannot identify a thief, rapist or child molester by looking at them naked, which is what these machines do. They simply allow security personnel to look at you naked and they are being quietly installed in airports all over Canada. </p>
<p>The people who are concerned about that are concerned about the erosion of their privacy. To lump informed and concerned citizens in with sexual predators indicates that it&#8217;s likely you are projecting in that penultimate sentence of your silly post.</p>
<p>As for &#8220;They only put you through this machine for the same reasons they would strip search you.&#8221;, I was going through security (I travel a lot and know enough to remove all metal, my shoes, etc before I pass through the detector) and was asked to step into one of those machines. There was no cause to strip-search me. I refused to step into the machine and was patted down by a female security guard instead.</p>
<p>Next time try informing yourself before you mouth off and demonstrate your ignorance to all and sundry, and quit taking up space with your asinine comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/2009/05/21/war-profiteers-unsatisfied-with-plain-old-war-profiteering-now-want-to-see-you-naked/#comment-16069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/?p=1471#comment-16069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This machine removes the need for a strip search( which can take up to 1 - 1 1/2 hour, and replaces it with a 30 second scan! They only put you through this machine for the same reasons they would strip search you. you can of cause opt for the Strip Search instead if you want several people to watch you undress, examine you, then send you on your way. the basic metal detector can be fooled, but 4.5 million years of evolution have made our Eyes very good indeed. I dont do anything ileagal, so have no fear of this machine, i want a Camera on every street, then if i get attacked, the police could track my attacker anywhere, and arrest him  in minuets. The only people who are opposed to this kind of Tech are peadophiles, thiefs and rapist. LONG LIVE 1984, and if you dont get the refrence then you are a retard!!!
God bless the system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This machine removes the need for a strip search( which can take up to 1 &#8211; 1 1/2 hour, and replaces it with a 30 second scan! They only put you through this machine for the same reasons they would strip search you. you can of cause opt for the Strip Search instead if you want several people to watch you undress, examine you, then send you on your way. the basic metal detector can be fooled, but 4.5 million years of evolution have made our Eyes very good indeed. I dont do anything ileagal, so have no fear of this machine, i want a Camera on every street, then if i get attacked, the police could track my attacker anywhere, and arrest him  in minuets. The only people who are opposed to this kind of Tech are peadophiles, thiefs and rapist. LONG LIVE 1984, and if you dont get the refrence then you are a retard!!!<br />
God bless the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lizor</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/2009/05/21/war-profiteers-unsatisfied-with-plain-old-war-profiteering-now-want-to-see-you-naked/#comment-13603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lizor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/?p=1471#comment-13603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s right GXB - I know someone who is involved in monitoring this stuff. The media has yet to include that fact in any of their coverage (that I have seen).

For example, there are no nipples in the image above and the pubic area looks more like Barbie than any woman I know.

Also, for the poster above who brought up drugs carried inside the body - the machines don&#039;t see internal organs, so won&#039;t catch a bag of white powder up your butt or in your stomach, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right GXB &#8211; I know someone who is involved in monitoring this stuff. The media has yet to include that fact in any of their coverage (that I have seen).</p>
<p>For example, there are no nipples in the image above and the pubic area looks more like Barbie than any woman I know.</p>
<p>Also, for the poster above who brought up drugs carried inside the body &#8211; the machines don&#8217;t see internal organs, so won&#8217;t catch a bag of white powder up your butt or in your stomach, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/2009/05/21/war-profiteers-unsatisfied-with-plain-old-war-profiteering-now-want-to-see-you-naked/#comment-13600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/?p=1471#comment-13600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope everyone&#039;s seen the incident where the Indian actor went through one of these in the UK and several of the women working for &quot;security&quot; theater had photocopies of his naked body scan that they actually had him sign.  So much for &quot;we don&#039;t keep/copy these images,&quot; and all the other lies the public is being fed about these Constitutionally illegal strip search scans.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope everyone&#8217;s seen the incident where the Indian actor went through one of these in the UK and several of the women working for &#8220;security&#8221; theater had photocopies of his naked body scan that they actually had him sign.  So much for &#8220;we don&#8217;t keep/copy these images,&#8221; and all the other lies the public is being fed about these Constitutionally illegal strip search scans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GXB</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/2009/05/21/war-profiteers-unsatisfied-with-plain-old-war-profiteering-now-want-to-see-you-naked/#comment-13598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GXB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/?p=1471#comment-13598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lizor: wait, are you saying that the things security guards will look at are MORE invasive than the sample photos that ND posted?  (Please, say it isn&#039;t so...)  If so, then they really could get sold to tabloids, with a little hacking or bribery.  And then the tabloid could edit in a weapon, and have something like &quot;[celebrity] tries to crash plane into [ex]&#039;s summer home!&quot; and include photos.  (Joking...I hope.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lizor: wait, are you saying that the things security guards will look at are MORE invasive than the sample photos that ND posted?  (Please, say it isn&#8217;t so&#8230;)  If so, then they really could get sold to tabloids, with a little hacking or bribery.  And then the tabloid could edit in a weapon, and have something like &#8220;[celebrity] tries to crash plane into [ex]&#8216;s summer home!&#8221; and include photos.  (Joking&#8230;I hope.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lizor</title>
		<link>http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/2009/05/21/war-profiteers-unsatisfied-with-plain-old-war-profiteering-now-want-to-see-you-naked/#comment-13587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lizor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/?p=1471#comment-13587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late comment, I know, but this thing has resurged since the (terribly - convenient) pre-christmas almost-terrorist incident, and sales of these machines to airports everywhere has skyrocketed. Oddly enough, the inventory was already there - as if they KNEW they&#039;d be needed...

An important point about these sample images is that they are not really accurate. Any media samples you see have a privacy filter switched on. They cannot actually publish the images that security people will be viewing, as these images are so graphic, they subvent mainstream publications&#039; content guidelines.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late comment, I know, but this thing has resurged since the (terribly &#8211; convenient) pre-christmas almost-terrorist incident, and sales of these machines to airports everywhere has skyrocketed. Oddly enough, the inventory was already there &#8211; as if they KNEW they&#8217;d be needed&#8230;</p>
<p>An important point about these sample images is that they are not really accurate. Any media samples you see have a privacy filter switched on. They cannot actually publish the images that security people will be viewing, as these images are so graphic, they subvent mainstream publications&#8217; content guidelines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

